<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace, HisSpace, OurSpace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php</link>
	<description>Carl Wilson on music, arts and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick_S</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2198</guid>
		<description>I forgot to respond to the part about Torontopia.



I guess I wasn't really an opponent of the actual core of Torontopian values... I certainly don't oppose communitarianism, especially for larger cities.  I guess I just think if it leads to insularity and irritating cliquey-ness... If one micro-community becomes the face of Torontopianism that's when I think it's an issue.



Myspace doesn't really have that.  It's too broad.  I don't really think of things as being Myspace bands.  I think of bands that I like on Myspace, and then the stuff I don't.



That's one of the great things about it is that what label your on is becoming increasingly less relevant. It's more about the music (in my opinion)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to respond to the part about Torontopia.</p>
<p>I guess I wasn&#8217;t really an opponent of the actual core of Torontopian values&#8230; I certainly don&#8217;t oppose communitarianism, especially for larger cities.  I guess I just think if it leads to insularity and irritating cliquey-ness&#8230; If one micro-community becomes the face of Torontopianism that&#8217;s when I think it&#8217;s an issue.</p>
<p>Myspace doesn&#8217;t really have that.  It&#8217;s too broad.  I don&#8217;t really think of things as being Myspace bands.  I think of bands that I like on Myspace, and then the stuff I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the great things about it is that what label your on is becoming increasingly less relevant. It&#8217;s more about the music (in my opinion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick_S</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... I think Myspace is great, particularly for marginal styles of music, and people who are living in relative musical isolation.  It's a great way to try your music on an audience.  It's excellent for networking with people with similar tastes.  I don't think it makes mediocrity any more or less "permissable" it simply allows everyone to have a crack at developing a community, and an audience.  For music like noise and improv, and other experimental music it's great.  And so far it's provided me as well projects I'm involved with some interesting opportunities.



It can also serve, for bands as almost like a business card. It's concise, compact and easy to navigate.  At times I think they're almost more useful than having a website.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I think Myspace is great, particularly for marginal styles of music, and people who are living in relative musical isolation.  It&#8217;s a great way to try your music on an audience.  It&#8217;s excellent for networking with people with similar tastes.  I don&#8217;t think it makes mediocrity any more or less &#8220;permissable&#8221; it simply allows everyone to have a crack at developing a community, and an audience.  For music like noise and improv, and other experimental music it&#8217;s great.  And so far it&#8217;s provided me as well projects I&#8217;m involved with some interesting opportunities.</p>
<p>It can also serve, for bands as almost like a business card. It&#8217;s concise, compact and easy to navigate.  At times I think they&#8217;re almost more useful than having a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>Daniel Vila once proposed to me a similar critique of communitarianism... except he thought the opposite.  An intensely supportive and self-propelling music community will result in lots of studied, well-wrought music.   Unfortunately, this makes naive, outsider music completely unappreciable.  His words were, "This world will never see another Shaggs."
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Vila once proposed to me a similar critique of communitarianism&#8230; except he thought the opposite.  An intensely supportive and self-propelling music community will result in lots of studied, well-wrought music.   Unfortunately, this makes naive, outsider music completely unappreciable.  His words were, &#8220;This world will never see another Shaggs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>p.s.  Didn't make it clear:  I like MySpace, but I miss those record stores like crazy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s.  Didn&#8217;t make it clear:  I like MySpace, but I miss those record stores like crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>I just found out that my hometown, Kalamazoo, Michigan, a college town with a big state university and an old small private college, with a population of 80,000, doesn't have a record store any more besides Best Buy.  When I was growing up, there were  2 local, independent rock-punk-hippie-jazz stores.  I was friends with the people at the smaller of the 2 stores, and they steered me toward which Mingus and Dolphy to explore when I was in high school.  There was also a classical-only store where I bought a 3-record set of Ives's complete symphonies.  A small town an hour west of us on Lake Michigan, South Haven, had a record store too.  I found a multi-record box of Anthony Braxton orchestral works there.  How that box ever got to that small town, I'll never know.  But that culture is gone.  I'm psyched about people being able to post and sell their music on the internet.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out that my hometown, Kalamazoo, Michigan, a college town with a big state university and an old small private college, with a population of 80,000, doesn&#8217;t have a record store any more besides Best Buy.  When I was growing up, there were  2 local, independent rock-punk-hippie-jazz stores.  I was friends with the people at the smaller of the 2 stores, and they steered me toward which Mingus and Dolphy to explore when I was in high school.  There was also a classical-only store where I bought a 3-record set of Ives&#8217;s complete symphonies.  A small town an hour west of us on Lake Michigan, South Haven, had a record store too.  I found a multi-record box of Anthony Braxton orchestral works there.  How that box ever got to that small town, I&#8217;ll never know.  But that culture is gone.  I&#8217;m psyched about people being able to post and sell their music on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>Dave M., complaining about the currents of fashion -- I've done it too, but it's like complaining about the tides.



Carl, I agree that playing live can teach writers and players about how their stuff is working, but recording-making and playing live are separate arts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave M., complaining about the currents of fashion &#8212; I&#8217;ve done it too, but it&#8217;s like complaining about the tides.</p>
<p>Carl, I agree that playing live can teach writers and players about how their stuff is working, but recording-making and playing live are separate arts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoilus</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>zoilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>This is the subject of a post I've been meaning to write for the past couple of weeks, Dave. Will try to get to it before the weekend. I think you're right, except: First, I think there are precedents of that scene being more open, which should be built upon. Second, to my ears *most* of the accusations of insularity aren't rooted in this kind of critique, at least not in any meaningful or specific way, and sound a lot more like Hajdu's rant.



I don't think the parallel is entirely wrong, in that Hajdu was talking about the same *kind* of in-group within MySpace that those people are talking about within Toronto. He didn't seem to be looking at the whole spectrum.



But you're right, MySpace is more diverse, as a function of its size and the fact that it takes no interaction to join it. Its whole range is probably more like a city than a scene. But I'd guess (though I haven't researched it) that MySpace is equally self-segregating, divided into "friends" groupings that do not meet across styles, cultures, sensibilities very often. Even where they do meet, again, it's far easier to click your way to integration than to live it.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the subject of a post I&#8217;ve been meaning to write for the past couple of weeks, Dave. Will try to get to it before the weekend. I think you&#8217;re right, except: First, I think there are precedents of that scene being more open, which should be built upon. Second, to my ears *most* of the accusations of insularity aren&#8217;t rooted in this kind of critique, at least not in any meaningful or specific way, and sound a lot more like Hajdu&#8217;s rant.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the parallel is entirely wrong, in that Hajdu was talking about the same *kind* of in-group within MySpace that those people are talking about within Toronto. He didn&#8217;t seem to be looking at the whole spectrum.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right, MySpace is more diverse, as a function of its size and the fact that it takes no interaction to join it. Its whole range is probably more like a city than a scene. But I&#8217;d guess (though I haven&#8217;t researched it) that MySpace is equally self-segregating, divided into &#8220;friends&#8221; groupings that do not meet across styles, cultures, sensibilities very often. Even where they do meet, again, it&#8217;s far easier to click your way to integration than to live it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M.</title>
		<link>http://www.zoilus.com/documents/general/2006/000695.php/comment-page-1#comment-2191</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zoilus.com/new/1/2006/000695.php#comment-2191</guid>
		<description>wow, that was the most appallingly unreasoned article ever. get one blog.



hajdu ham-handedly implies that bands like fallout boy are popular because kids on myspace are more interested in interacting with them and their fans than listening to them, which is a laughable assertion -- if blink 182 became huge, why not fallout boy? besides, socializing is a factor in the popularity of all bands, not just the ones who've gotten label deals through myspace. but where the comparison to torontopia (i'm going to keep using the word because i can't think of a substitute) falls down is that myspace is incredibly diverse, while torontopia is a very narrow slice of the things going on in this city.



like Hajdu with MySpace, the temptation for torontopia-haters is to assume that because they don't like the bands falling under that banner, the scene around those bands must be propping them up, when in truth the scene is based around bands of a certain style that not everybody is going to like.



my critique of torontopia (gonna call it that because i can't think of anything else) is that it isn't nearly as open as you'd allege, because if you don't like the kind of bands who play at those venues, it's tough to be a part of the scene. really, you're never going to see rappers or latin bands or whatever at those shows. The Boat and The Bagel and Wavelength are great, and so is DIY-ness. but it's frustrating that those initiatives have the power to draw tons of people, possibly because of their narrowness of focus, yet someone who can't stand most of the music feels utterly isolated by it.



same with torontopia's non-musical aspects. i am loath to criticize something that brings people together in activism or intellectual pursuits, but again, it's tough when other causes that are equally worthy struggle to find a constituency because they're not connected to the right cultural currents, musical or otherwise.



a person in this city can, and i suspect many of them do, spend their entire cultural life within the confines of torontopia-affiliated projects, but because it's so focused around a specific taste usually kin to people of similar cultural backgrounds, i'd say that cultural life would be a pretty narrow and limited one. not that torontopia was ever intended to form a complete cultural diet -- my point is that although it's great that these things are being done, and done with a sense of pride, no less (a feat in itself), many many people in this city are being left out. and it could be made more diverse, but the people putting on these events generally throw up their hands and say that it's not their responsibility. ok, it's not, but then you have to suffer the slings and arrows of those who rightly accuse you of being insular.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, that was the most appallingly unreasoned article ever. get one blog.</p>
<p>hajdu ham-handedly implies that bands like fallout boy are popular because kids on myspace are more interested in interacting with them and their fans than listening to them, which is a laughable assertion &#8212; if blink 182 became huge, why not fallout boy? besides, socializing is a factor in the popularity of all bands, not just the ones who&#8217;ve gotten label deals through myspace. but where the comparison to torontopia (i&#8217;m going to keep using the word because i can&#8217;t think of a substitute) falls down is that myspace is incredibly diverse, while torontopia is a very narrow slice of the things going on in this city.</p>
<p>like Hajdu with MySpace, the temptation for torontopia-haters is to assume that because they don&#8217;t like the bands falling under that banner, the scene around those bands must be propping them up, when in truth the scene is based around bands of a certain style that not everybody is going to like.</p>
<p>my critique of torontopia (gonna call it that because i can&#8217;t think of anything else) is that it isn&#8217;t nearly as open as you&#8217;d allege, because if you don&#8217;t like the kind of bands who play at those venues, it&#8217;s tough to be a part of the scene. really, you&#8217;re never going to see rappers or latin bands or whatever at those shows. The Boat and The Bagel and Wavelength are great, and so is DIY-ness. but it&#8217;s frustrating that those initiatives have the power to draw tons of people, possibly because of their narrowness of focus, yet someone who can&#8217;t stand most of the music feels utterly isolated by it.</p>
<p>same with torontopia&#8217;s non-musical aspects. i am loath to criticize something that brings people together in activism or intellectual pursuits, but again, it&#8217;s tough when other causes that are equally worthy struggle to find a constituency because they&#8217;re not connected to the right cultural currents, musical or otherwise.</p>
<p>a person in this city can, and i suspect many of them do, spend their entire cultural life within the confines of torontopia-affiliated projects, but because it&#8217;s so focused around a specific taste usually kin to people of similar cultural backgrounds, i&#8217;d say that cultural life would be a pretty narrow and limited one. not that torontopia was ever intended to form a complete cultural diet &#8212; my point is that although it&#8217;s great that these things are being done, and done with a sense of pride, no less (a feat in itself), many many people in this city are being left out. and it could be made more diverse, but the people putting on these events generally throw up their hands and say that it&#8217;s not their responsibility. ok, it&#8217;s not, but then you have to suffer the slings and arrows of those who rightly accuse you of being insular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

